Skip to main content

Total Pageviews

๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป

           



เฅ 


เค…เคธเคคो เคฎा เคธเคฆ्เค—เคฎเคฏ। 

เคคเคฎเคธो เคฎा เคœ्เคฏोเคคिเคฐ्เค—เคฎเคฏ। 

เคฎृเคค्เคฏोเคฐ्เคฎा เค…เคฎृเคคं เค—เคฎเคฏ।

เฅ เคถांเคคिः เคถांเคคिः เคถांเคคिः


๐”น๐•™๐•’๐•˜๐•ง๐•’๐••๐•˜๐•š๐•ฅ๐•’

เคคเคค्เคฐैเค•เคธ्เคฅं เคœเค—เคค्เค•ृเคค्เคธ्เคจं เคช्เคฐเคตिเคญเค•्เคคเคฎเคจेเค•เคงा ।
เค…เคชเคถ्เคฏเคฆ्เคฆेเคตเคฆेเคตเคธ्เคฏ เคถเคฐीเคฐे เคชाเคฃ्เคกเคตเคธ्เคคเคฆा ॥ 11.13 ॥

Then Arjuna (the Pฤแน‡แธava) beheld there, in the body of the God of gods (ลšrฤซ Kแน›แนฃแน‡a), the entire universe—existing as one, yet appearing divided into many forms.

Unity in diversity: The whole cosmos is one Reality, though it seems manifold.
Viล›varลซpa revelation: All names and forms are contained within the Divine, not outside Him.
Advaitic pointer: Apparent multiplicity (anekadhฤ) does not negate essential oneness (ekastham).
Shift of vision: Not a change in the world, but a transformation in Arjuna’s perception—from fragmented seeing to holistic truth.

What appears many is truly One; the One alone appears as many.

๐•๐•š๐•ง๐•–๐•œ๐•’๐•”๐•™๐•ฆ๐••๐•’๐•ž๐•’๐•Ÿ๐•š

เคคเคค्เคค्เคตंเคชเคฆाเคญ्เคฏाเคฎเคญिเคงीเคฏเคฎाเคจเคฏोः
เคฌ्เคฐเคน्เคฎाเคค्เคฎเคจोः เคถोเคงिเคคเคฏोเคฐ्เคฏเคฆीเคค्เคฅเคฎ् ।
เคถ्เคฐुเคค्เคฏा เคคเคฏोเคธ्เคคเคค्เคค्เคตเคฎเคธीเคคि เคธเคฎ्เคฏเค—्
เคเค•เคค्เคตเคฎेเคต เคช्เคฐเคคिเคชाเคฆ्เคฏเคคे เคฎुเคนुः ॥ เฅจเฅชเฅง


When Brahman (Tat) and the individual Self (Tvam), denoted by the two words “That” and “Thou,” are properly purified by removing their limiting adjuncts, the Upaniแนฃadic revelation, through the statement “Tat Tvam Asi”, clearly and repeatedly establishes only their absolute oneness.

This verse explains the true intent of the Mahฤvฤkya “Tat Tvam Asi.”
At the empirical level, Tat (Brahman) appears as the omniscient, cosmic cause, while Tvam (the individual) appears as a limited knower and doer. This apparent difference arises solely due to upฤdhis—the superimposed limitations of mฤyฤ, body, mind, and intellect.
Through ล›odhana (refinement) by lakแนฃaแน‡ฤ-vแน›tti—specifically bhฤga-tyฤga (discarding the contradictory attributes)—the incidental features of both Tat and Tvam are negated. What remains is their essential nature: pure, attributeless consciousness.
The Upaniแนฃads therefore do not teach similarity, proximity, or relationship between the individual and Brahman. They unequivocally declare identity. Liberation is not the attainment of something new, but the clear recognition of an ever-accomplished fact:
The Self has always been Brahman; knowledge alone removes the ignorance that obscured this truth.This is the central and decisive conclusion of Advaita Vedฤnta.



HAVE A BRIGHT AND CHEERFUL DAY

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

๐—” ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐˜†: ๐—” ๐—›๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฎ ๐—–๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ฟ (๐Ÿฒ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฉ๐—ฒ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฒ) ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—˜๐—ข

When Integrity Takes a Back Seat: Leadership Fails. In a large ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—น ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ the Chief Executive Officer (๐—–๐—˜๐—ข)—already having five official vehicles, including a Toyota Fortuner and SX4—initiated the acquisition of an additional Honda City car (6th vehicle) for his official use just two years before his retirement. There was no operational need, no functional gap, yet the process moved with astonishing velocity and precision. What followed exposes not just procedural negligence, but a deeper ethical breakdown in leadership. The Incident — Step by Step 1. Unjustified Requirement:   Despite ample mobility resources, the CEO insisted on adding another car to his fleet. 2. Questionable Procurement Process:   The vehicle was leased through a single tender nomination.  On the same day:  STE was issued,  Offer was received,  Technical recommendation was finalized.  Within 48 hours, purchase/Contract order was placed — an efficiency seen only when ...

๐—˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐—” ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป

  ๐—˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐—” ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป Human life is an extraordinary and rare opportunity—a sacred doorway to self-knowledge and ultimate liberation. It is a brief but precious moment in the vast expanse of existence, meant for awakening to the truth of pure consciousness. Yet, the very instruments intended to illuminate this truth—the mind (manas), intellect (buddhi), and inner awareness (antahkarana)—are delicate and prone to distortion. Classical Indian philosophy identifies four fundamental defects that cloud understanding and perpetuate bondage: Bhrama (Delusion), Pramada (Heedlessness), Vipralipsa (Deceit), and Karnapaแนญava (Inattention in Hearing). These are not mere abstract concepts; they are living tendencies that shape perception, judgment, and moral orientation. To recognize and remove them is to polish the mirror of the mind, allowing it to reflect the effulgence of the Self (Atman). The...

๐—” ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ป "๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ-๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜†๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜"

๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ: Pre-employment medical examinations are a vital safeguard in technically demanding industrial environments, ensuring that only medically fit candidates are inducted. These examinations are governed by detailed procedures designed to uphold transparency, accuracy, and professional integrity. Any deviation from these standards not only compromises the legitimacy of the recruitment process but also exposes the system to allegations of malpractice and weakens public trust. This case study concerns a complaint lodged by a selected candidate for the post of Operator-cum-Technician (OCT) in an integrated steel plant. The candidate alleged that he was declared “temporarily unfit” during the pre-employment medical examination because he refused to pay a bribe of Rs 1 lakh, demanded by the examining doctors. A vigilance inquiry into the Pre-employment Medical Examination Report, related documents, and statements of the medical personnel involved revealed several procedural ...