Skip to main content

Total Pageviews

๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป

 





เฅ 


เค…เคธเคคो เคฎा เคธเคฆ्เค—เคฎเคฏ। 

เคคเคฎเคธो เคฎा เคœ्เคฏोเคคिเคฐ्เค—เคฎเคฏ। 

เคฎृเคค्เคฏोเคฐ्เคฎा เค…เคฎृเคคं เค—เคฎเคฏ।

 เฅ เคถांเคคिः เคถांเคคिः เคถांเคคिः


๐”น๐•™๐•’๐•˜๐•ง๐•’๐••๐•˜๐•š๐•ฅ๐•’

เค†เคฆिเคค्เคฏाเคจाเคฎเคนं เคตिเคท्เคฃुเคฐ्เคœ्เคฏोเคคिเคทां เคฐเคตिเคฐंเคถुเคฎाเคจ् |
เคฎเคฐीเคšिเคฐ्เคฎเคฐुเคคाเคฎเคธ्เคฎि เคจเค•्เคทเคค्เคฐाเคฃाเคฎเคนं เคถเคถी || 10.21||

Amongst the twelve sons of Aditi I am Vishnu; amongst luminous objects I am the sun. Know Me to be Marichi amongst the maruts, and the moon amongst the stars in the night sky.

The Adityas, sons of Aditi, are twelve (1) Dhata, (2) Mitra, (3) Aryama, (4) Sakra, (5) Varuna, (6) Amsu, (7) Bhaga, (8) Vivasvan, (9) Pusha, (10) Savita, (11) Tvashta, (12) Vishnu. These names are mentioned in the Adi Parva of Mahabharata.

The Lord declares that He is Vishnu among the Adityas, implying that His glory is most manifest in Vishnu. The other beings mentioned should be understood in a similar manner. The Lord has stated that He would mention the most powerful of the manifestations. In the small heap of stones as well as in the Himalayas, He is equally present. Both are His manifestations. And yet, in the Himalayas we see a vaster and mightier manifestation which will satisfy the seeker’s imagination and give him an immediate perception of His Glory.

The Marut Devas are seven: (1) Ahava, (2) Pravaha, (3) Nivaha, (4) Paravaha, (5) Udvaha, (6) Samvaha, (7) Parivaha (Marichi).

๐•๐•š๐•ง๐•–๐•œ๐•’๐•”๐•™๐•ฆ๐••๐•’๐•ž๐•’๐•Ÿ๐•š

เค…เคคो เคจाเคฏं เคชเคฐाเคค्เคฎा เคธ्เคฏाเคฆ्เคตिเคœ्เคžाเคจเคฎाเคฏाเคถเคฌ्เคฆเคญाเค•् ।
เคตिเค•ाเคฐिเคค्เคตाเคœ्เคœเคกเคค्เคตाเคš्เคš เคชเคฐिเคš्เค›िเคจ्เคจเคค्เคตเคนेเคคुเคคः ।

เคฆृเคถ्เคฏเคค्เคตाเคฆ्เคต्เคฏเคญिเคšाเคฐिเคค्เคตाเคจ्เคจाเคจिเคค्เคฏो เคจिเคค्เคฏ เค‡เคท्เคฏเคคे || 206 ||

This knowledge sheath (Vijรฑฤnamฤyฤ Koล›a) that we have been speaking of, cannot be the Supreme Self for the following reasons - because it is subject to change, is insentient, is a limited thing, an object of the senses, and is not constantly present: An unreal thing cannot indeed be taken for the real ฤ€tman.

 

This verse clarifies that the jฤซva or individual self cannot be the supreme ฤ€tman. The empirical self is associated with the body-mind intellect (vijnana), is a product of mฤyฤ, undergoes change, is inert by nature, limited, objectifiable, and inconsistent in experience. That which is changing, finite, and known cannot be the eternal knower. Therefore, the ฤ€tman alone is the true, unchanging Reality — not the conditioned individual.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

๐—” ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐˜†: ๐—” ๐—›๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฎ ๐—–๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ฟ (๐Ÿฒ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฉ๐—ฒ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฒ) ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—˜๐—ข

When Integrity Takes a Back Seat: Leadership Fails. In a large ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—น ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ the Chief Executive Officer (๐—–๐—˜๐—ข)—already having five official vehicles, including a Toyota Fortuner and SX4—initiated the acquisition of an additional Honda City car (6th vehicle) for his official use just two years before his retirement. There was no operational need, no functional gap, yet the process moved with astonishing velocity and precision. What followed exposes not just procedural negligence, but a deeper ethical breakdown in leadership. The Incident — Step by Step 1. Unjustified Requirement:   Despite ample mobility resources, the CEO insisted on adding another car to his fleet. 2. Questionable Procurement Process:   The vehicle was leased through a single tender nomination.  On the same day:  STE was issued,  Offer was received,  Technical recommendation was finalized.  Within 48 hours, purchase/Contract order was placed — an efficiency seen only when ...

๐—˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐—” ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป

  ๐—˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐—” ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป Human life is an extraordinary and rare opportunity—a sacred doorway to self-knowledge and ultimate liberation. It is a brief but precious moment in the vast expanse of existence, meant for awakening to the truth of pure consciousness. Yet, the very instruments intended to illuminate this truth—the mind (manas), intellect (buddhi), and inner awareness (antahkarana)—are delicate and prone to distortion. Classical Indian philosophy identifies four fundamental defects that cloud understanding and perpetuate bondage: Bhrama (Delusion), Pramada (Heedlessness), Vipralipsa (Deceit), and Karnapaแนญava (Inattention in Hearing). These are not mere abstract concepts; they are living tendencies that shape perception, judgment, and moral orientation. To recognize and remove them is to polish the mirror of the mind, allowing it to reflect the effulgence of the Self (Atman). The...

๐—” ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ป "๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ-๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜†๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜"

๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ: Pre-employment medical examinations are a vital safeguard in technically demanding industrial environments, ensuring that only medically fit candidates are inducted. These examinations are governed by detailed procedures designed to uphold transparency, accuracy, and professional integrity. Any deviation from these standards not only compromises the legitimacy of the recruitment process but also exposes the system to allegations of malpractice and weakens public trust. This case study concerns a complaint lodged by a selected candidate for the post of Operator-cum-Technician (OCT) in an integrated steel plant. The candidate alleged that he was declared “temporarily unfit” during the pre-employment medical examination because he refused to pay a bribe of Rs 1 lakh, demanded by the examining doctors. A vigilance inquiry into the Pre-employment Medical Examination Report, related documents, and statements of the medical personnel involved revealed several procedural ...