Skip to main content

Total Pageviews

๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป (๐Ÿฐ๐˜๐—ต ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ, ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฌ๐Ÿฎ๐Ÿฑ)






เฅ 


เค…เคธเคคो เคฎा เคธเคฆ्เค—เคฎเคฏ। 

เคคเคฎเคธो เคฎा เคœ्เคฏोเคคिเคฐ्เค—เคฎเคฏ। 

เคฎृเคค्เคฏोเคฐ्เคฎा เค…เคฎृเคคं เค—เคฎเคฏ।

 เฅ เคถांเคคिः เคถांเคคिः เคถांเคคिः



๐—จ๐—ป๐—บ๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ธ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ธ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ: ๐—›๐—ผ๐˜„ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐— ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—–๐—ผ๐—ป๐˜€๐˜๐—ฟ๐˜‚๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—œ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ข๐˜„๐—ป ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ด๐—ฒ

The captivity of the mind begins with a subtle yet profound illusion—the unquestioned assumption that there exists a thinker behind thought. This single presupposition becomes the invisible axis around which the entire sense of “I” revolves. In truth, there is only spontaneous cognition arising in awareness. But thought, appearing in the form of language, assumes authorship and declares itself to be the one who thinks. Thus arises the mirage of doership—the claim, “I am the thinker of these thoughts.”

        Once this fiction takes root, every subsequent thought refers back to it, reinforcing the illusion. The mind, now believing itself to be both observer and actor, divides experience into subject and object, self and world. This imagined duality becomes the first wall of the cage.

As the Astavakra Gita declares:


เค•เคฐ्เคคृเคค्เคตं เคช्เคฐเคนเคฐเคธ्เคฏाเคค्เคฎเคจ्เคฏेเคทा เคนि เคฌเคจ्เคงเคธ्เคฏ เค•ाเคฐเคฃเคฎ् ।

เค‡เคนैเคต เคธเคฎ्เคฏเค—्เคœ्เคžाเคจेเคจ เคธ्เคตाเคคเคจ्เคค्เคฐ्เคฏं เคช्เคฐाเคช्เคฏ เคถाเคจ्เคคिเคฎ् ॥

“The idea that you are the doer is the black serpent of bondage; by right knowledge, here and now, attain freedom and peace.”

        From this primal division arises psychological time. The thinker projects a past—“what I have done”—and a future—“what I must become.” Thus continuity is invented where only presence exists. Measuring itself against these imagined coordinates, the mind strives to perfect an identity that is itself a conceptual construct. The prison, therefore, is not built by external conditions but by inward referencing—thought believing its own narrative.


        The body becomes the mirror of this inner conflict. Every moment of resistance—when reality refuses to conform to the mind’s image—registers as contraction. The nervous system echoes the tension of belief. Thus, the body bears witness to the mind’s struggle to uphold a false identity.


        When Bhagavan Ramana Maharshi urged, “Investigate the one who thinks,” he was handing us the key to this self-created cage. The so-called thinker cannot be found, for it has no existence apart from the thought that claims it. When sought directly, the thinker dissolves into the pure witnessing of thought—awareness itself. In that instant of seeing, the cage disintegrates, for there was never a prisoner inside.


        The irony is profound: the mind imagines bondage and then seeks liberation from its own illusion. Freedom is not the annihilation of the mind but the recognition that it was never a captor—merely a transient movement within the boundless expanse of awareness.


As Adi Sankaracharya proclaims in the Vivekachudamaแน‡i:


เคฌเคจ्เคงो เคนि เคฎाเคจเคธं เคช्เคฐाเคนुเคฐ्เคฎोเค•्เคทं เคคเคธ्เคฏैเคต เคจिःเคธ्เคชृเคนเคฎ् ।

เคฌเคจ्เคงं เคค्เคฏเค•्เคค्เคตा เคตिเคจिเคฐ्เคฎुเค•्เคคः เคช्เคฐเคฎोเคฆं เคฒเคญเคคे เคฌुเคงः ॥

“Bondage is imagination of the mind; liberation is freedom from that imagination.

The wise one, having renounced bondage, abides in spontaneous joy.”


The thinker was imagination.Awareness was never bound.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

๐—” ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐˜†: ๐—” ๐—›๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฎ ๐—–๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ฟ (๐Ÿฒ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฉ๐—ฒ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฒ) ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—˜๐—ข

When Integrity Takes a Back Seat: Leadership Fails. In a large ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—น ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ the Chief Executive Officer (๐—–๐—˜๐—ข)—already having five official vehicles, including a Toyota Fortuner and SX4—initiated the acquisition of an additional Honda City car (6th vehicle) for his official use just two years before his retirement. There was no operational need, no functional gap, yet the process moved with astonishing velocity and precision. What followed exposes not just procedural negligence, but a deeper ethical breakdown in leadership. The Incident — Step by Step 1. Unjustified Requirement:   Despite ample mobility resources, the CEO insisted on adding another car to his fleet. 2. Questionable Procurement Process:   The vehicle was leased through a single tender nomination.  On the same day:  STE was issued,  Offer was received,  Technical recommendation was finalized.  Within 48 hours, purchase/Contract order was placed — an efficiency seen only when ...

๐—˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐—” ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป

  ๐—˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐—” ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป Human life is an extraordinary and rare opportunity—a sacred doorway to self-knowledge and ultimate liberation. It is a brief but precious moment in the vast expanse of existence, meant for awakening to the truth of pure consciousness. Yet, the very instruments intended to illuminate this truth—the mind (manas), intellect (buddhi), and inner awareness (antahkarana)—are delicate and prone to distortion. Classical Indian philosophy identifies four fundamental defects that cloud understanding and perpetuate bondage: Bhrama (Delusion), Pramada (Heedlessness), Vipralipsa (Deceit), and Karnapaแนญava (Inattention in Hearing). These are not mere abstract concepts; they are living tendencies that shape perception, judgment, and moral orientation. To recognize and remove them is to polish the mirror of the mind, allowing it to reflect the effulgence of the Self (Atman). The...

๐—” ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ป "๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ-๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜†๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜"

๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ: Pre-employment medical examinations are a vital safeguard in technically demanding industrial environments, ensuring that only medically fit candidates are inducted. These examinations are governed by detailed procedures designed to uphold transparency, accuracy, and professional integrity. Any deviation from these standards not only compromises the legitimacy of the recruitment process but also exposes the system to allegations of malpractice and weakens public trust. This case study concerns a complaint lodged by a selected candidate for the post of Operator-cum-Technician (OCT) in an integrated steel plant. The candidate alleged that he was declared “temporarily unfit” during the pre-employment medical examination because he refused to pay a bribe of Rs 1 lakh, demanded by the examining doctors. A vigilance inquiry into the Pre-employment Medical Examination Report, related documents, and statements of the medical personnel involved revealed several procedural ...