Skip to main content

Total Pageviews

๐— ๐—ผ๐—ฟ๐—ป๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—œ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฝ๐—ถ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป

 






เฅ 


เค…เคธเคคो เคฎा เคธเคฆ्เค—เคฎเคฏ। 

เคคเคฎเคธो เคฎा เคœ्เคฏोเคคिเคฐ्เค—เคฎเคฏ। 

เคฎृเคค्เคฏोเคฐ्เคฎा เค…เคฎृเคคं เค—เคฎเคฏ।

เฅ เคถांเคคिः เคถांเคคिः เคถांเคคिः


๐”น๐•™๐•’๐•˜๐•ง๐•’๐••๐•˜๐•š๐•ฅ๐•’

เคชुเคฐोเคงเคธां เคš เคฎुเค–्เคฏं เคฎां เคตिเคฆ्เคงि เคชाเคฐ्เคฅ เคฌृเคนเคธ्เคชเคคिเคฎ् |
เคธेเคจाเคจीเคจाเคฎเคนं เคธ्เค•เคจ्เคฆ: เคธเคฐเคธाเคฎเคธ्เคฎि เคธाเค—เคฐ: || 10.24||

O Arjun, amongst priests, I am Brihaspati; amongst warrior chiefs I am Kartikeya; and amongst reservoirs of water, know Me to be the ocean.

A priest discharges the function of performing ritualistic worship and ceremonies in temples and homes. Brihaspati is the chief priest in heaven. He is thus the topmost of all priests. Here, Shree Krishna says that amongst priests, he is Brihaspati. However, in the ลšhrฤซmad Bhฤgavatam, verse 11.16.22, Shree Krishna states that amongst the priests he is Vashishtha. Why is he differing in the two places? This implies that we should not attach importance to the object, but to the opulence of God that manifests in that object. All the objects of glory that Shree Krishna is describing here should also be understood in the same light. It is not the object that is being emphasized, rather God’s opulence that is manifesting in it.

Kartikeya, the son of Lord Shiv, who is also called Skanda, is the commander-in-chief of the celestial gods. He is thus the chief of all military commanders, and best reflects the opulence of God. Shree Krishna further says that amongst stagnant bodies of water, he is the grave and mighty ocean.


๐•๐•š๐•ง๐•–๐•œ๐•’๐•”๐•™๐•ฆ๐••๐•’๐•ž๐•’๐•Ÿ๐•š

เคจैเคตाเคฏเคฎाเคจเคจ्เคฆเคฎाเคฏाः เคชเคฐाเคค्เคฎा เคธोเคชाเคงिเค•เคค्เคตाเคค् เคช्เคฐเค•ृเคคेเคฐ्เคตिเค•ाเคฐाเคค् ।
เค•ाเคฐ्เคฏเคค्เคตเคนेเคคोः เคธुเค•ृเคคเค•्เคฐिเคฏाเคฏाเคตिเค•ाเคฐเคธเค™्เค˜ाเคคเคธเคฎाเคนिเคคเคค्เคตाเคค् ॥ 209 ॥

The ฤ€nandamayakoล›a (bliss sheath) is not the Supreme Self (Paramฤtma), because: It is conditioned (upฤdhika) and limited.It is a product or modification (vikฤra) of prakแน›ti. It is created (kฤrya) and appears only through the support of past meritorious actions (sukแน›ta). It is composed of subtle modifications and is therefore subject to change, unlike the changeless Self.

The bliss we feel in deep sleep or in moments of quiet joy is not the infinite Brahman—it belongs to a sheath, a covering.
Even the subtlest layer of experience—the ฤnandamayakoล›a—is not the Self, because it is:Limited,Produced,Dependent, Changeful.
The true Self is beyond all sheaths, untouched by merit or action—pure, infinite, and immutable.

HAVE A BRIGHT AND CHEERFUL DAY

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

๐—” ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐˜†: ๐—” ๐—›๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฎ ๐—–๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ฟ (๐Ÿฒ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฉ๐—ฒ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฒ) ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—˜๐—ข

When Integrity Takes a Back Seat: Leadership Fails. In a large ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—น ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ the Chief Executive Officer (๐—–๐—˜๐—ข)—already having five official vehicles, including a Toyota Fortuner and SX4—initiated the acquisition of an additional Honda City car (6th vehicle) for his official use just two years before his retirement. There was no operational need, no functional gap, yet the process moved with astonishing velocity and precision. What followed exposes not just procedural negligence, but a deeper ethical breakdown in leadership. The Incident — Step by Step 1. Unjustified Requirement:   Despite ample mobility resources, the CEO insisted on adding another car to his fleet. 2. Questionable Procurement Process:   The vehicle was leased through a single tender nomination.  On the same day:  STE was issued,  Offer was received,  Technical recommendation was finalized.  Within 48 hours, purchase/Contract order was placed — an efficiency seen only when ...

๐—˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐—” ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป

  ๐—˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐—” ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป Human life is an extraordinary and rare opportunity—a sacred doorway to self-knowledge and ultimate liberation. It is a brief but precious moment in the vast expanse of existence, meant for awakening to the truth of pure consciousness. Yet, the very instruments intended to illuminate this truth—the mind (manas), intellect (buddhi), and inner awareness (antahkarana)—are delicate and prone to distortion. Classical Indian philosophy identifies four fundamental defects that cloud understanding and perpetuate bondage: Bhrama (Delusion), Pramada (Heedlessness), Vipralipsa (Deceit), and Karnapaแนญava (Inattention in Hearing). These are not mere abstract concepts; they are living tendencies that shape perception, judgment, and moral orientation. To recognize and remove them is to polish the mirror of the mind, allowing it to reflect the effulgence of the Self (Atman). The...

๐—” ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ป "๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ-๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜†๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜"

๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ: Pre-employment medical examinations are a vital safeguard in technically demanding industrial environments, ensuring that only medically fit candidates are inducted. These examinations are governed by detailed procedures designed to uphold transparency, accuracy, and professional integrity. Any deviation from these standards not only compromises the legitimacy of the recruitment process but also exposes the system to allegations of malpractice and weakens public trust. This case study concerns a complaint lodged by a selected candidate for the post of Operator-cum-Technician (OCT) in an integrated steel plant. The candidate alleged that he was declared “temporarily unfit” during the pre-employment medical examination because he refused to pay a bribe of Rs 1 lakh, demanded by the examining doctors. A vigilance inquiry into the Pre-employment Medical Examination Report, related documents, and statements of the medical personnel involved revealed several procedural ...