Skip to main content

Total Pageviews

๐—ง๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜€๐—ฐ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐—•๐—ผ๐—ฑ๐˜†, ๐—ฆ๐—ฝ๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ฒ ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ ๐—ง๐—ถ๐—บ๐—ฒ: ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—ฉ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜๐—ถ๐—ฐ ๐—ฉ๐—ถ๐˜€๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—™๐—ฟ๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ผ๐—บ






We feel ourselves bound—bound to a body, bound to space, and bound to time. Every action occurs at a particular place and moment, while its result arrives at another time and often in another place. Sometimes the karma itself spans lifetimes: an action performed in one birth yields its fruit in another. This ceaseless movement through changing bodies, locations, and circumstances creates the peculiar and painful sense of confinement we call saแนsฤra.

Vedanta, however, reveals that this bondage is not real; it is merely superimposed on the Self. The Kaแนญhopaniแนฃad declares:

“เค…เคถเคฐीเคฐं เคถเคฐीเคฐेเคท्เคตเคจเคตเคธ्เคฅेเคท्เคตเคตเคธ्เคฅिเคคเคฎ् । เคฎเคนाเคจ्เคคं เคตिเคญुเคฎाเคค्เคฎाเคจं เคฎเคค्เคตा เคงीเคฐाः เคจ เคถोเคšเคคि ॥”

“Realising the bodiless, all-pervading, vast Self dwelling in the body, the wise grieve no more.”

The true Self is never limited by object, space, or time. All objects lie within the scope of perception and are therefore finite. But I, the knowing consciousness, am not an object. Space is perceived by me, time is recognised by me; that which is known cannot be the knower.

Thus the Upaniแนฃads proclaim:

*“เคจिเคค्เคฏो เคจिเคค्เคฏाเคจां เคšेเคคเคจเคถ्เคšेเคคเคจाเคจाเคฎ्।”*

“The Eternal among the non-eternal, the Conscious among the conscious.”

Adi Shankaracharya  states this truth with striking clarity:

“เคฆेเคถเค•ाเคฒเคตเคธ्เคคुเคชเคฐिเคš्เค›ेเคฆाเคคीเคคोเคฝเคนเคฎ्।”

“I am beyond limitation by space, time, or object.”

The body grows, ages, and perishes; space appears to expand and contract in our experience; time flows ceaselessly. Yet I, the witnessing consciousness, remain unchanged. Action and its result belong solely to prakแน›ti, not to the Self. Even karmic transmigration is nothing but a drama played out in the domain of time, while the timeless Self is merely the witness.

Bhagavan in the Gita gently lifts our vision to this higher truth:

“เค‰เคฆाเคธीเคจเคตเคฆाเคธीเคจो เค—ुเคฃैเคฐ्เคฏो เคจ เคตिเคšाเคฒ्เคฏเคคे। เค—ुเคฃा เคตเคฐ्เคคเคจ्เคค เค‡เคค्เคฏेเคตं เคฏोเคฝเคตเคคिเคท्เค เคคि เคจेเค™्เค—เคคे ॥”

“Remaining as if indifferent, unmoved by the guแน‡as, knowing that the guแน‡as alone act—such a one abides and does not waver.”

To transcend bondage is not to escape the world, but to recognise our real nature:

I am that Truth—limitless, changeless, and free—ever untouched by birth, action, or result.

The task is simply to recognise what already is.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

๐—” ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐˜†: ๐—” ๐—›๐—ผ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฎ ๐—–๐—ถ๐˜๐˜† ๐—–๐—ฎ๐—ฟ (๐Ÿฒ๐˜๐—ต ๐—ฉ๐—ฒ๐—ต๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—น๐—ฒ) ๐—ณ๐—ผ๐—ฟ ๐—ง๐—ต๐—ฒ ๐—–๐—˜๐—ข

When Integrity Takes a Back Seat: Leadership Fails. In a large ๐—ฆ๐˜๐—ฒ๐—ฒ๐—น ๐—ฃ๐—น๐—ฎ๐—ป๐˜ the Chief Executive Officer (๐—–๐—˜๐—ข)—already having five official vehicles, including a Toyota Fortuner and SX4—initiated the acquisition of an additional Honda City car (6th vehicle) for his official use just two years before his retirement. There was no operational need, no functional gap, yet the process moved with astonishing velocity and precision. What followed exposes not just procedural negligence, but a deeper ethical breakdown in leadership. The Incident — Step by Step 1. Unjustified Requirement:   Despite ample mobility resources, the CEO insisted on adding another car to his fleet. 2. Questionable Procurement Process:   The vehicle was leased through a single tender nomination.  On the same day:  STE was issued,  Offer was received,  Technical recommendation was finalized.  Within 48 hours, purchase/Contract order was placed — an efficiency seen only when ...

๐—˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐—” ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป

  ๐—˜๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด ๐——๐—ฒ๐—ณ๐—ฒ๐—ฐ๐˜๐˜€ ๐—ผ๐—ณ ๐—›๐˜‚๐—บ๐—ฎ๐—ป ๐—จ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐˜€๐˜๐—ฎ๐—ป๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ป๐—ด: ๐—” ๐—ฃ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ต ๐˜๐—ผ ๐—Ÿ๐—ถ๐—ฏ๐—ฒ๐—ฟ๐—ฎ๐˜๐—ถ๐—ผ๐—ป Human life is an extraordinary and rare opportunity—a sacred doorway to self-knowledge and ultimate liberation. It is a brief but precious moment in the vast expanse of existence, meant for awakening to the truth of pure consciousness. Yet, the very instruments intended to illuminate this truth—the mind (manas), intellect (buddhi), and inner awareness (antahkarana)—are delicate and prone to distortion. Classical Indian philosophy identifies four fundamental defects that cloud understanding and perpetuate bondage: Bhrama (Delusion), Pramada (Heedlessness), Vipralipsa (Deceit), and Karnapaแนญava (Inattention in Hearing). These are not mere abstract concepts; they are living tendencies that shape perception, judgment, and moral orientation. To recognize and remove them is to polish the mirror of the mind, allowing it to reflect the effulgence of the Self (Atman). The...

๐—” ๐—–๐—ฎ๐˜€๐—ฒ ๐—ฆ๐˜๐˜‚๐—ฑ๐˜† ๐—ผ๐—ป "๐—ฃ๐—ฟ๐—ฒ-๐—ฒ๐—บ๐—ฝ๐—น๐—ผ๐˜†๐—บ๐—ฒ๐—ป๐˜ ๐— ๐—ฒ๐—ฑ๐—ถ๐—ฐ๐—ฎ๐—น ๐—ง๐—ฒ๐˜€๐˜"

๐—•๐—ฎ๐—ฐ๐—ธ๐—ด๐—ฟ๐—ผ๐˜‚๐—ป๐—ฑ: Pre-employment medical examinations are a vital safeguard in technically demanding industrial environments, ensuring that only medically fit candidates are inducted. These examinations are governed by detailed procedures designed to uphold transparency, accuracy, and professional integrity. Any deviation from these standards not only compromises the legitimacy of the recruitment process but also exposes the system to allegations of malpractice and weakens public trust. This case study concerns a complaint lodged by a selected candidate for the post of Operator-cum-Technician (OCT) in an integrated steel plant. The candidate alleged that he was declared “temporarily unfit” during the pre-employment medical examination because he refused to pay a bribe of Rs 1 lakh, demanded by the examining doctors. A vigilance inquiry into the Pre-employment Medical Examination Report, related documents, and statements of the medical personnel involved revealed several procedural ...